Showing posts with label Harry Potter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Harry Potter. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Emma Watson - Harry Potter Premieres

2 premieres - 2 dresses, and
Emma Watson
rocks them both!


Is there anything Emma Watson can't do? She's an actress, a college student, and a model (she is currently under contract with LancĂ´me and Burberry). I have a feeling that this girl may have the longest career of the original Harry Potter trio.At the New York Premiere of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. 2 wearing an edgy bronze colored corset dress by Bottega Veneta. I love that she took daring all the way by doing dramatic eyes and sleek hair.
Love it, like it, or hate it?
At the London Premiere of HP 7.2, Emma dons a soft gray Oscar de la Renta gown. I love the full tulle skirt paired with a beaded bodice. The dress also works with a white Antonio Berardi jacket. Emma looks simply stunning for her last Harry Potter premiere.

But enough about my opinion.
What do you think?

Monday, August 11, 2008

The Tales of Beedle the Bard

The latest creation from magical muggle author J.K. Rowling is this stunning collectors edition of The Tales of Beedle the Bard. Offered exclusively through Amazon.com, this leather-bound collector's copy is a costly $100, but is seemingly worth the price. With re-creations of Rowling's original hand-written introduction, as well as drawings and extensive notes taken by Professor Albus Dumbledore himself, the book looks to be a rare treat. Along with 5 short stories by the Bard himself, this handsome volume also includes background information on wizarding society and history; from the early muggle "witch hunts" to present-day dark arts and beyond. Beedle the Bard (to be released December 4, 2008) has jumped to the top of my "wish list", and would make a wonderful gift for your imaginative would-be-wizard or collector of rare and unique treasures. Happy reading!

Thursday, July 19, 2007

HP poll results

It's official: You love Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban! It garnered 66% of votes, while Order of the Phoenix came in second, with 22%, and Goblet of Fire 11%. The Christopher Columbus directed films Sorcerer's Stone and Chamber of Secrets received no votes. Could it be the almost slavish adherence to J.K. Rowling's books as the reason for no votes, or simply that the films seem to be more exciting with each new director?

As for preferences, I love Azkaban (the movie), yet my favorite book (thus far) remains Order of the Phoenix. Speaking of books, what is your favorite Harry Potter novel? Will you be picking up a copy of Deathly Hallows this weekend?

Saturday, July 14, 2007

Order of the Phoenix

I woke up this morning feeling alternately sad and elated. Last night I saw “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix” at the IMAX theatre. If any of you have read the book (which happens to be my favorite of the 6 published), then you’ll know what I’m talking about. This muggle was absolutely thrilled to see all of my favorite passages finally realized on the big screen. From Dementors, to Dumbledore, to Delores and detention, this one had it all!

There are times when the story strays slightly from the books. Many scenes have been axed for the preservation of time: SPEW meetings, trips to Hogsmeade Village and a fateful visit to St. Mungo’s Hospital. For those wishing to see all of those things, it may turn into bitter disappointment. Never fear, however. The crux of the story remains largely intact (which is no small feat considering the book is 800+ pages). For others who may not like it, perhaps it is because they dislike seeing their favorite wizard all- grown-up (which I assure you he is). In this film, Harry has to comes to grips with his father (the bully?), being kept in the dark by the adults, training the ranks of Dumbledore’s Army, the long-anticipated kiss with Cho, and of course detention with Professor Umbridge.

With the new movie also comes the introduction of new characters (Luna Lovegood) and villains…Umbridge herself is beautifully realized by a sinister and perky Imelda Staunton, and of course no one could be a better antagonist to the beloved Sirius (played by the fantastic Gary Oldman) than Bellatrix Lestrange (the also amazing Helena Bonham Carter), whose time onscreen is sadly lacking. However, the stolen moments between Sirius and Harry more than make up for any grievances, especially as they fight side-by-side in the tear-filled, white-knuckle climax at the Ministry of Magic (which MUST be seen in 3-D).

The awesome scope of the last 20 minutes of the film are incredibly realized as Deatheaters do battle for Lord Voldemort in one of the greatest literary/film duels of all-time. Please, please, please do yourself a favor and read the book to supplement what was lost in the film, but enjoy the incredible spectacle of what has been put on the big screen.

Monday, July 9, 2007

Goodbye, Harry

*This article sums up my feelings perfectly. I hope you enjoy!
--------------------------------------------------------------
Goodbye, Harry
by Stephen King

I'm having a day of mixed feelings: happy because I'm reading the manuscript of a novel that's full of magic, mystery, and monsters; sad because it will be finished tomorrow and on my shelf, with all its secrets told and its surviving characters set free to live their own lives (if characters have lives beyond the end of a novel — I've always felt they do). It's called The Monsters of Templeton, by Lauren Groff, and it will be published early next year.

Did you think I meant the final Harry Potter tale? Don't be a sillykins — not even your Uncle Stevie gets that one in advance (although I'm sure you agree that he should, he should). But I expect to face the same feelings, only stronger, when the pages of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows dwindle down to the final few. Hell, I had trouble saying goodbye to Tony Soprano, and let's face it — he was a turd. Harry's one of the good guys. One of the great guys, in fact, and the same holds true for his friends.

The sense of sadness I feel at the approaching end of The Monsters of Templeton isn't just because the story's going to be over; when you read a good one — and this is a very good one — those feelings are deepened by the realization that you probably won't tie into anything that much fun again for a long time. This particular melancholy deepens even more when the story is spread over multiple volumes. I felt it as I approached the end of Mervyn Peake's Gormenghast trilogy, more strongly as I neared the conclusion of Frodo's quest in The Lord of the Rings, and with painful keenness when, as the writer, I got to the end of The Dark Tower, which stretched over seven volumes and a quarter century's writing time.

When it comes to Harry, part of me — a fairly large part, actually — can hardly bear to say goodbye. I'd guess that J.K. Rowling feels the same, although I'd also guess those feelings are mingled with the relief of knowing that the work is finally done, for better or worse.

And I'm a grown-up, for God's sake — a damn Muggle! Think how it must be for all the kids who were 8 when Harry debuted in Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, with its cartoon jacket and modest (500 copies) first edition. Those kids are now 18, and when they close the final book, they will be in some measure closing the book on their own childhoods — magic summers spent in the porch swing, or reading under the covers at camp with flashlights in hand, or listening to Jim Dale's recordings on long drives to see Grandma in Cincinnati or Uncle Bob in Wichita. My advice to families containing Harry Potter readers: Stock up on the Kleenex. You're gonna need it. It's all made worse by one unavoidable fact: It's not just Harry. It's time to say goodbye to the whole cast, from Moaning Myrtle to Scabbers the rat (a.k.a. Wormtail). Which leads to an interesting question — will the final volume satisfy Harry's longtime (and very devoted) readers?

Although the only thing we can be sure of is that Deathly Hallows won't end in a 10-second blackout (you're going to hear that a lot in the next few weeks), my guess is that large numbers of readers will not be satisfied even if Harry survives (I'm betting he will) and Lord Voldemort is vanquished (I'm betting on this, too, although evil is never vanquished for long). I'm partly drawing on my own experience with The Dark Tower (reader satisfaction with the ending was low — tough titty, since it was the only one I had); partly on my belief that very few long works end as felicitously as Tolkien's Rings series, with its beautiful pilgrimage into the Grey Havens; but mostly on the fact that there is that sadness, that inevitable parting from characters who have been loved deeply by many. The Internet blog sites will be full of this was bad and that was wrong, but it's going to boil down to something that many will feel and few will come right out and state: No ending can be right, because it shouldn't be over at all. The magic is not supposed to go away.

Rowling will almost certainly go on to other works, and they may be terrific, but it won't be quite the same, and I'm sure she knows that. Readers will be able to go back and reread the existing books — as I've gone back to Tolkien, as my wife goes back to Patrick O'Brian's wonderful sea stories featuring Captain Aubrey and Dr. Maturin, as others do with novels featuring Travis McGee or Lord Peter Wimsey — and rereading is a great pleasure, but it's not the bated-breath, what's-gonna-happen-next suspense that Potter readers have enjoyed since 1997. And, of course, Harry's audience is different. It is, in large part, made up of children who will be experiencing these unique and rather terrible feelings for the first time.

But there's comfort. There are always more good stories, and now and then there are great stories. They come along if you wait for them. And here's something I believe in my heart: No story can be great without closure. There must be closure, because it's the human condition. And since that's how it is, I'll be in line with my money in my hand on July 21.

And, I must admit, sorrow in my heart.

Thursday, June 14, 2007

next Harry Potter?

For those of you (like me) who are going to be crying into your butterbeer this summer because the era of Harry Potter is coming to a close, I have some interesting news. I'm not sure if it will alleviate your sorrows; simply that it may take away some of the sting of losing our favorite literary boy. I stumbled upon this article a few days ago, so I thought I'd share a snippet with all of you. Let me know what you think:

"The publisher who first signed up J.K. Rowling, believes he may have found another Harry Potter…but this time it is a boy archaeologist. 'I knew from page one that Harry Potter was magic. Reading 'Tunnels' gave me the same thrill,' said Cunningham. 'Tunnels has it all: a boy archaeologist, merciless villains, a lost world and an extraordinary journey to the center of the earth.'"

As a side note: Entertainment Weekly reports that plans for a Harry Potter theme park called, "The Wizarding World of Harry Potter", are shortly to be unveiled by Universal. Below is an artists rendering of the proposed park:
Free Image Hosting at allyoucanupload.com